{"id":11665,"date":"2026-06-04T13:21:09","date_gmt":"2026-06-04T13:21:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alsuprun.com\/blog\/?p=11665"},"modified":"2026-06-04T13:21:12","modified_gmt":"2026-06-04T13:21:12","slug":"wave-genetics-debunk-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alsuprun.com\/blog\/wave-genetics\/wave-genetics-debunk-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Wave Genetics Debunk"},"content":{"rendered":"

Peter Gariaev and his team conducted research into wave genetics<\/a> in Russia; their efforts were quickly attacked by those opposed to any new scientific discovery.<\/p>\n

Genomes act as quantum biocomputers by recording, scanning and broadcasting regulatory genetic-metabolic information using waves.<\/p>\n

Eugenics<\/h2>\n

Eugenics conjures images of Nazi atrocities and state-level eugenics policies such as forced sterilisation for people deemed ineligible to reproduce. Though its roots have since been discredited, its beliefs still linger on – such as believing intelligence, poverty or criminality are hereditary traits that can be selected for through selective breeding programs.<\/p>\n

At the turn of the 20th century, British scientist Francis Galton began investigating heritability of human traits such as intelligence and personality. To conduct these investigations, he collected biographical information from obituaries and other sources in order to compile pedigrees of wealthy families; coining his investigations “eugenics,” meaning “good in birth.” According to Galton’s theory, heritable characteristics such as intelligence or personality could be improved through encouraging people with desirable attributes like good character and sound health to produce more children while discouraging reproduction from those with undesirable traits like poverty mental illness or criminality.<\/p>\n

Eugenics was plagued with social bias and encouraged researchers to focus on narrow sets of genes they believed caused complex human traits like criminality, poverty and mental illness. Meanwhile, this movement ignored any possible role that environment may have had; research by prominent eugenists such as David Spiegel was limited due to limited access to comprehensive family histories that covered three or more generations.<\/p>\n

However, many city governments embraced eugenics. Many believed their rising populations of homeless and ill people were due to hereditary genetic factors combined with poor living conditions and ineffective approaches for addressing social problems like crime and poverty.<\/p>\n

Obasogie wants to bring these issues out from behind closed doors and into national dialogue. He began studying eugenics in November 2018, after receiving an email listing funding opportunities at the School of Public Health that contained an appeal for research on genes associated with high IQ that might enable parents to create smart babies. Since then he has collaborated with Michele Pridmore-Brown of LARB’s science and technology section as well as researchers with the Center of Science, Technology Medicine and Society at UC Berkeley on raising awareness on potential consequences resulting from such work.<\/p>\n

Genetic Engineering<\/h2>\n

Genetic engineering is the practice of altering organism’s DNA in order to add desirable characteristics, typically by cutting and rejoining fragments from different species’ DNA fragments, producing desired traits in an organism. Genetic engineering has many applications such as increasing food yield, creating medical products with unique qualities or developing drug-resistant bacteria strains; additionally it’s utilized in scientific research such as cloning or synthetic biology research projects.<\/p>\n

Though genetic engineering has proven its worth in producing medically essential products, it comes with risks. Genetically modified crops have caused an increase in toxicity for both humans and the environment alike. Furthermore, GMO crops can carry mutations which cause diseases that could pass down through generations.<\/p>\n

GMO organisms pose potential health hazards to society as well as unintended negative repercussions that are detrimental to its well-being. The risk is exacerbated when genetically engineered crops are used industrially; for instance, their genetic material could have the ability to cross pollinate with wild trees containing sexually compatible genes and thus introduce harmful genes into wild populations that have unintended negative outcomes for other ecosystem organisms.<\/p>\n

Scientists have long experimented with genetically modified organisms. Unfortunately, some experiments have produced unexpected outcomes, including rabbits engineered with longer tongues or cattle engineered to not have horns yet ended up harboring long stretches of bacterial DNA in their genomes (Smith 5). Such incidents demonstrate just how unpredictable and potentially hazardous genetic engineering can be.<\/p>\n

Genetically engineered organisms pose a devastating threat to humanity on both biological and economic fronts. On one front, natural lethal pathogens like poliovirus or Y. pestis can be made even deadlier by genetic engineers through recreation or enhancement techniques; on another front they can cause infrastructure to collapse with repair costs exceeding millions for repair costs arising out of contamination of industries by these genetically modified organisms; this problem persists even as scientists continue exploring and creating novel genetic engineering techniques.<\/p>\n

Genetic Testing<\/h2>\n

Genetic testing can detect changes (mutations) to your genes that could contribute to medical conditions and determine whether you’re carrying one of them as carriers. It also shows if your lifestyle, family planning decisions, career decisions and\/or insurance needs need adjusting – depending on which kind of test and results are delivered, healthcare providers may recommend lifestyle modifications, family planning decisions, insurance options or career advice accordingly.<\/p>\n

An individual with a positive result of genetic testing indicates that they may be carrying a mutation that can lead to disease, and should discuss their findings with healthcare providers in order to decide on next steps.<\/p>\n

Negative results on genetic tests mean that no altered genes were identified; however, this does not guarantee that a person will never develop genetic disease in the future; test accuracy varies and new information on gene and health condition relationships can alter previously negative test results.<\/p>\n

Gene panels look for changes to several genes that could contribute to a particular symptom or condition, and are recommended when other gene tests don’t provide clear answers. Large-scale genomic testing, which explores over several thousand genes simultaneously, may also be recommended when other tests fail or when patients wish to explore their entire genetic makeup.<\/p>\n

Uncertain results aren’t uncommon when analyzing many genes at once, though this won’t usually have any direct ramifications for medical care or the recommendations made by healthcare teams to further clarify uncertain results for you and\/or biological family members. Over time, this will help researchers better understand how genetic variants influence health outcomes.<\/p>\n

Genetic Modification<\/h2>\n

Genetic modification is an innovative technology used by scientists to alter the sequence of genes within an organism, creating new traits or eliminating existing ones; or moving genes between species. Scientists often employ genetic modification in their research efforts when looking for treatments for human illnesses.<\/p>\n

Genetic engineering can also be used to engineer crops that are resistant to disease or can grow faster, helping ensure sustainable food supplies in the future. Some individuals oppose genetic modification as it creates new life forms or transfers genes between species without ethical consideration, potentially leading to allergies or health complications in subsequent generations. However, some also worry that such technology might have unintended negative side-effects such as allergies.<\/p>\n

Recently, news about two Chinese babies with modified CCR5 genes prompted widespread concern over gene editing. Scientists used a tool called Crispr to make these modifications. Crispr uses an automatic guide sequence system to tell it which part of DNA to bind and cut before their body’s natural repair system mending any breaks it caused in DNA strands.<\/p>\n

However, the tool wasn’t perfect accurate; scientists wanted to alter only CCR5 gene; however, other parts of genome were accidentally edited as a result of off-target effects, something common among gene editing methods – in one study unintended changes occurred more than half of the time!<\/p>\n

Additionally, these babies with mutant CCR5 genes also inherited other mutations from their parents, which may have contributed to their unusual behaviors like hyperactivity and anxiety. It could also alter brain development since research suggests humans without functional CCR5 genes may be less likely to recover from strokes or do well academically.<\/p>\n

Some individuals believe linguistic wave genetics<\/a> offers a viable alternative to conventional medicine. Gariaev matrices, quantum-acoustic programs that influence DNA and promote healing and regeneration, have been proposed by NovoCure as a possible treatment option for various conditions, including cancer and autoimmune disorders.<\/p>\n