New research has unlocked DNA’s ability to serve as an efficient wave bio-computer, potentially helping eliminate harmful pathogens, viruses and bacteria as well as increase human lifespan.
Research being undertaken is being hindered by an internal group within the Russian Academy of Sciences called “The Group to Combat Pseudoscience in Russia”, who attack and suppress physical proof results that don’t meet Popp’s Criteria.
It is based on a faulty premise
Wave genetics pseudoscience rests on an outdated theory which has since been disproven. The central assumption behind Wave genetics was that much DNA did not code for proteins but was instead “junk”, serving solely to provide structure to the genome. New research, however, disproved this notion; scientists discovered that much junk DNA encodes for essential biological functions like micro RNAs, long repeat RNAs and other essential RNAs which carry out essential biological roles like controlling gene expression or helping control response to stress in cells.
One of the hallmarks of pseudoscience is how its proponents respond to disproved theories or scientific discoveries that undermine them, often by reframing or reinventing them, often by asserting their new theories are more scientific than previous ones. This tactic has been employed throughout history from nineteenth-century eugenics through to antievolutionism in the 1990s.
Geneticists who promoted this field claimed that an individual’s environment or ancestry determined his intelligence; experiments proved this assertion. Such scientific racism echoed earlier forms of pseudoscience and represented an alarming trend within science itself.
Unfortunately, as a result of political maneuverings and personal preferences, many genetic research projects that could revive dead organs and extend lifespan were suppressed – an outrage against both science itself and humanity as a whole. This was particularly tragic given that Russian Academy of Sciences should be driven solely by science’s best interests, not political pressures or preferences of individuals or political movements.
Gariaev’s scientific work is founded upon the theory of coherent physical radiations, the principles of holography and solitons, fractal representations of DNA and human verbal expression/speech, as well as fractal representations. These principles have been demonstrated through numerous tests, experiments and observations, including his ability to regrow vital internal organs without expensive surgical techniques – including regrow vital internal organs without surgery! His findings also have many practical applications such as cancer prevention/treatment/extension of life expectancy/extension as well as eliminating pathogenic bacteria and agricultural vermin parasites/worms!
It is based on a faulty theory
Wave genetics pseudoscience is based on a theory that states DNA transmits electromagnetic imprints of itself to distant cells, potentially using this technology as a command to perform specific functions or even as a way of transporting DNA between cells – an idea not unfamiliar in science circles but generally disregarded as pseudoscience.
Wave genetic research is conducted predominantly in Russia by members of the Russian Academy of Sciences who include physicists, molecular biologists and embryologists. Furthermore, this group developed a laser that can polarize-holographically record, scan, transmit and inject genetic and metabolic information between biological systems – this technology has been successfully tested on animals as well as humans.
While this research has been thoroughly explored and physically verified, it does not receive the recognition it merits. This is unfortunate, since its application could revolutionize medicine and life extension technology. Popp’s Criteria as well as scientific progress require this work be supported rather than suppressed.
Early in the 1950s, several geneticists began to express concerns over Lysenko’s totalitarian methods and intolerance for criticism. One such critic was Hermann Muller who voiced concerns to the Central Committee of the Communist Party regarding Soviet tyranny in science through letters like Hermann Muller’s letter in 1948 to VASKhNIL session; during which Lysenko was denounced as idealistic pseudobiology that was antinational science (Paul 1983; Wolfe 2010).
The Soviet government responded quickly to the outcry of foreign scientists. Within one week of VASKhNIL session, the Academy of Sciences issued a statement calling for an end to Lysenkoism that was signed by 83 geneticists including Dobzhansky and Huxley. Unfortunately, not until 2014 did Lev Zhivotovsky from Institute for General Genetics publish a book defending Lysenko’s works as being fundamental. Unfortunately this work relies upon flawed reasoning as well as many uncorroded sources while disregarding evidence presented at VASKhNIL session to conclude this way that scientific work equals political regime value of scientific endeavor.
It is based on a faulty technology
Wave genetics technology is founded on the idea that DNA encodes information as a hologram, which can then be decoded with quantum computing technology to create artificial genes for plants or animals to achieve greater growth, health or longevity. With such advances coming on stream so quickly today’s genetic engineering techniques could seem as obsolete as when the Wright brothers first invented flight.
Gariaev and his group in Russia have conducted extensive research using this technique to repair damaged pancreas in mice and dogs, such as by producing insulin (an important hormone responsible for controlling blood sugar levels) production, while also being able to reduce tumors within both species using this approach.
However, this new form of genetic engineering has caused considerable debate. Many scientific publications have dismissed its effectiveness as pseudoscience and critics have accused researchers of exploiting vulnerable patients and misleading the public with this technology. Regardless of these allegations, researchers have published numerous studies backing their claims while providing proof of effectiveness by showing it can regenerate human cells and tissue in vitro.
Wave genetics is founded on the idea that genetic traits are determined by both biological and non-biological factors, including non-biological influences like environmental conditions. Furthermore, wave genetics suggests that race itself is an illusion, which can lead to misinformation and confusion. While facts about geographic ancestry are useful in providing context and providing context about genetic differences across populations, attaching “race” labels can cause more harm than good; biological conceptions of race have been linked to various negative associations and false assumptions.
It is based on a faulty conclusion
Wave genetics theory relies on the idea that genetic information travels via electromagnetic waves as vibrational energy, with such vibrational energy then reaching living organisms where it is transformed into bio-signals which then signal organs to carry out desired functions – this phenomenon is called quantum nonlocality and allows information to travel without losing its quality as it passes from organism to organism.
The scientific community has responded with surprise to this theory. Many researchers contacted by New Scientist likened it to “pathological science”, while Gary Schuster, an expert on DNA conductance effects claims this research is fraudulent.
Although many scientists remain sceptical of DNA as consciousness, the wave genetics approach has won them over. The theory behind it holds that DNA transmits electromagnetic imprints of itself into distant cells and fluids where they are faithfully copied by enzymes into real DNA for each recipient organism; effectively teleporting itself across spaces.
Scientists have employed this concept to build artificial DNA computers. These computers use DNA combined with photons as data storage and processing mechanisms; however, there are numerous issues with the theory: first it employs an incorrect interpretation of quantum mechanics; secondly it doesn’t account for how environmental influences may alter DNA behavior; and finally building these computers is extremely expensive and time consuming.
Wave genetics presents another problem by making unfounded claims regarding genetic engineering’s benefits, while pseudoscience often uses scientific language and the perception that accompanies it to spread doubt and misinformation. When using scientific language and phrases for claims made against it, these claims become more credible as perceived impartial truth seeking statements.
As the debate on genetics and race demonstrates, pseudoscience can be detrimental to society. It often comes with roots in eugenics that lead to racism and xenophobia; additionally, such pseudoscience fosters historical myopia among natural scientists that leads to miscommunication and biases.
