Information technology professionals specialize in designing, installing and supporting computer systems and networking components within businesses, while designing, maintaining and troubleshooting IT infrastructures for their companies.
After 10 years of effort, the Human Genome Project has finally filled in most gaps in our genetic map. With cost-cutting sequencing technologies fast approaching newborn screening programs, prognosis and preventive strategies will soon become feasible and accurate.
The Theory
The Human Genome Project (HGP) was an ambitious scientific venture, but ultimately fell short of expectations set forth by its proponents. HGP serves as an illustration of “social bubble” theory; that is, when people invest in new opportunities with high hopes and high expectations that lead to unrealistically optimistic forecasts of commercially lucrative applications for its technology.
The HGP also failed in terms of ethical, political and philosophical ramifications. Notably, it failed to address pressing public health problems like obesity and the opiate epidemic, even after devoting most of its funding towards those projects. Instead, its primary impact was shifting genetic research away from its traditional concerns with human heredity towards its promise of altering human nature itself.
It has been noted that the HGP’s success points up a fundamental flaw in biological thinking that extends far beyond genomic research itself. This flaw lies in believing that biological species are defined primarily by genetic properties and can be understood through comparison between human, chimpanzee, bonobo, Neanderthal and other reference sequences; such comparisons rely on flawed theories of natural selection that claim genetically identical members of one species should act and think similarly.
One promising approach to genetic code would be viewing it more as a language than as a map of cell structure. According to this alternative viewpoint, DNA contains information which can be translated through wave forms associated with geometry and topology of cells containing DNA molecules; this concept is known as wave genomics.
Gariaev and his colleagues demonstrated this phenomenon by exposing seeds from Arabidopsis thaliana (mouse-ear cress) gathered at Chernobyl to a laser beam for several days; within several days, these seeds sprouted normally and looked normal again.
It was due to how the laser beam created a torsion field around seeds, altering their genetic code. A similar effect was also witnessed at Heartmath Institute by Vladimir Poponin and his team.
The Experimental Results
Contrary to what has become commonly accepted genetic theory, this theory asserts that genes are encoded with “texts”, similar to what human languages produce naturally in context-dependent ways. This allows genome information to shape biological systems including both cells and organisms as a whole.
Text-like wave information transmissions are recorded within DNA preparations’ polarization plane, where they correlate polarization-wise with photons and radio waves; making these transmissions quantum nonlocal and creating an associative memory linked to endogenous physical fields within genome biocomputers such as laser radiations on chromosomes.
Experiments conducted demonstrate how chromosome apparatus is capable of using its laser radiations to generate broad band genetic-sign radio waves that provide unlimited information about an organism’s metabolism and environment. Furthermore, both theory and experiment show how laser radiations can also be used to correct DNA mutations and thus restore an organism’s health.
Another essential experimental result was that DNA can be affected by various forms of information, from sound waves to electromagnetic fields and light and chemicals. Greg Braddon and his team showed that human DNA could be impressed by spoken words as well as musical sounds, while researchers at University of Maryland discovered a specific chemical that makes DNA more reactive to radiofrequency energy.
Recently, Russian scientists conducted experiments to assess how sensitive DNA molecules are to music and words. They demonstrated how DNA strands could be affected by vibrations from chrysanthemum cells; suggesting that their resonance frequencies can be altered through external signals.
These results have an unprecedented impact on our understanding of DNA. This study is the first time it has been demonstrated that chromosome apparatus can record and transmit wave information. When an organism is born, an initial video tape containing wave information is created in their genome which eventually gets corrupted with time leading to disease, old age and eventually death; this phenomenon is known as DNA Phantom Effect and provides confirmation for Wave genetics principles.
The Conclusions
Wave genome theory offers a novel perspective on genetics. It suggests that DNA is more than simply an information store passed along from generation to generation; rather it has a dynamic presence in physical reality. Different organisms’ DNAs interact through electromagnetic waves emitted by them and when these waves interact with objects they cause vibrations which shift along with its content within their DNAs – altering both vibrations as well as information stored therein.
That is why a single DNA may look differently among various organisms within a species and also between completely unrelated organisms; and why even from small samples of an individual’s DNA fragments we can gather valuable insight into its structure and history.
Scientists use the remnants of Neanderthal DNA present in some genomes as an indicator of human evolution, while comparison of human DNA with that from other organisms enables researchers to explore our nature as humans and guide medical research efforts.
Genome scientists have long understood the ramifications of their work and advocated for careful use of racial and ethnic categories, yet still experience concerns regarding genome-based profiling in criminal justice systems, which detracts attention away from pressing social and health problems such as opioid epidemic and mental illness (Gannett 1998).
Montagnier and his colleagues’ wave-based genomics approach increases these concerns further. They found that certain bacterial DNA sequences emit very low-frequency electromagnetic signals when exposed to large volumes of water. When these signals pass through a graphene or metal tube, they generate magnetic fields which interact with electrons in DNAs to generate currents; these currents allow researchers to map out chick embryonic genomes inside eggs as well as determine their gender by measuring what kind of electromagnetic signal each egg generates.
The Future
The genome project’s successes have been so remarkable that it’s easy to lose sight of its controversy. From early on, many scientists expressed worry that its popularity would spark an unnecessary race to sequence the human genome and drain resources away from other research; furthermore, knowledge of gene sequence was insufficient to yield insights into gene function (Davies and Colleagues 1990).
But genomics revolution is unstoppable. Not only have researchers used genomics to map human genome, they’ve used it to identify genes associated with different diseases and compare human and chimpanzee, bonobo and Neandertal genomes to explore questions about what it means to be species.
More broadly, cheaper sequencing will enable scientists to better study more complex diseases such as schizophrenia and depression, which often exhibit subtle variations between gene-environment interactions. Such findings could enable scientists to design more effective drugs for these disorders or devise methods of early diagnosis.
Geneomics has also played an essential role in the creation of tools for high-throughput parallel experimentation and data analysis, laboratory automation and nanotechnology development – advances which have greatly expedited discovery while making interpretation of genomic data much simpler (Bamshad 2018).
The Human Genome Project has brought immense benefits, yet it remains fraught with controversy. Ethicists, philosophers of science and political theorists continue to examine its issues and debate their resolution.
Researchers are concerned that genomics’ use of social categories like race and ethnicity may lead to legal profiling; moreover, DNA information about an individual could be used against them in discriminatory ways (Gisler et al. 2010).
These issues underscore the need to carefully weigh potential risks against genetic research’s promise. Genomics remains an invaluable resource for discovering and creating novel therapies and treatments that save lives; therefore, we should ensure it continues to make an impactful contribution toward addressing pressing public health problems like increasing obesity rates, the opiate epidemic and mental illness.
