While western science largely attempts to interpret only five percent of a genome, Russian scientists led by Dr Gariaev took an altogether more expansive and expansive view. Their work revealed that DNA cannot only be read sequentially but can be changed.
Gariaev and his team were able to manipulate coherent laser light and radio waves and add semantics (meaning) into their carrier waves in order to reprogram DNA’s codon sequences.
What is Dr. Gariaev’s work?
Gariaev‘s work has contributed significantly to our understanding of DNA. He published numerous scientific articles, co-authored with leading physicists from MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY and foreign researchers, four monographs, and numerous patents as a result of his research; its main practical outcome being fundamentally new correction technologies for human health conditions as well as increasing active lifespan of people.
Garyaev‘s research is founded on electromagnetic waves as carriers of information such as genetic code. These electromagnetic waves then pass this data to cells or organisms which then interprets it according to its needs – this concept has been coined “wave genetics” or ‘lingvistiko-wave genomics”, and was the basis for his 2021 Nobel Prize nomination and subsequent honor from RAMTN and NYAS.
Reprogramming of DNA
Human embryos begin developing into sperm or eggs with epigenetic tags that specify which cell types they will become, so before an organism reaches full maturity these tags must be erased through a process known as reprogramming whereby specialized cellular machinery searches the genome to remove all instances of these tags from each cell’s genome and erases them – leaving only a select few genes unchanged between parents and offspring.
Epigenetic reprogramming has emerged as a cornerstone of rejuvenation research. Multiple groups have demonstrated how human terminally differentiated cells can be converted to induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by applying certain factors; these iPS cells can then be used to study cell differentiation and development while not creating tumors or spontaneous mutations, making them suitable for medical applications.
However, many challenges must still be overcome before iPS cells can be used clinically. Self-replicating and free from tumorigenic potential must first be established before stable chromosome recombination or DNA methylation patterns can form. Yet many researchers remain optimistic about iPS cell research’s future potential; working to increase efficiency.
Many groups are also exploring the use of small molecules during reprogramming to decrease both toxicity and improve efficiency, including augmenting chromatin remodeling or inhibiting DNA methyltransferases. Some groups have even been successful at creating iPS cells without any of the original four transcription factors – these cells display Oct4 and Nanog, in addition to expression of pluripotency markers, have unmethylated promoters, and produce viable chimeras.
Although advancements have been made, it remains unknown exactly how iPS cells can be reprogrammed to achieve epigenetic independence. A recent study examined methylation status before and after reprogramming in human dermal fibroblasts; OSKM and TRA-1-60 cells displayed decreased levels of methylation after 49 days after being exposed to reprogramming; they also used gene expression markers and cell markers to assess whether stem cell-like properties had returned; ultimately leading them to conclude that their predicted eAge predicted by these biomarkers gradually declined during this process of reprogramming.
The ‘DNA Phantom’
The DNA Phantom’ is a theory being promoted by some researchers, which asserts that DNA can absorb photons from its surrounding environment, with energy from these photons believed to shape its structure and allow it to retain information. While this theory hasn’t been scientifically confirmed yet, many scientists remain dubious of it and it must therefore be tested through replicable experiments that help disprove this idea and discredit conspiracy theorist pseudoscience claims against it.
Gariaev conducted one of his experiments by placing some DNA inside a quartz container and shining laser light at it, only to discover that light radiated from it in an intriguing spiral pattern around the DNA itself – even after Gariaev removed the DNA, this pattern persisted, leading some scientists to deem this phenomenon the “DNA Phantom Effect.”
Dr. Gariaev has discovered that it is possible to ‘blast’ a DNA phantom using supercold liquid nitrogen gas, and its photons will escape its force field. Within 5 to 8 minutes however, new photons will be captured by its body again and it will reappear as an invisible force field.
This phenomenon resembles phantom leaf and phantom limb effects seen before, although scientists now suspect the DNA phantom may actually be evidence of an overlooked physical vacuum substructure that was overlooked before. Scientists are currently exploring this substructure with hopes of fully explaining the DNA phantom effect and providing a physical theory of consciousness as a result.
Scientists are still exploring this theory, yet it seems unlikely they’ll ever be able to prove it conclusively. Any theories which cannot be reproduced by independent sources are generally considered conspiracies and therefore not seen as scientifically valid; nonetheless, many have taken an interest in this concept which provides explanations for some of the universe’s mysteries.
The ‘DNA Book of Life’
As biologists studied DNA after its discovery by James Watson, Francis Crick, Maurice Wilkins and Rosalind Franklin in 1953, they often referred to this molecule as the ‘book of life’ – this reference being meant to echo biblical interpretations and suggest that one day scientists might one day read and understand this “book” for themselves.
But the book of life is more complex than meets the eye; its structure consists of letters (bases), words (codons), sentences (genes), and chapters (chromosomes), all interwoven together in an intricate system that still confounds biologists despite all available molecular tools.
Reading the genome has proven an arduous task; therefore, the concept of the ‘book of life’ has lost much of its original significance.
Today, instead of being overwhelmed with enthusiasm over decoding DNA and reading its pages in life’s storybook, many are more excited by gene or genome editing thanks to new techniques such as CRISPR. However, now that it is more accurate to ‘edit the book of life’ than ever before, this has profound ramifications for ethical considerations regarding human enhancement and potential medical treatment exploitation. We shall return to this complex topic later, but for now it’s worth recalling a headline in USA Today from 1989 that declared: “Ethical Questions Plague Gene Research” by Tim Friend on 4 October 1989 as an introduction to some of the complexities and paradoxes related to using the metaphor of the “Book of Life”.
